The aim of this work is the qualification of commercially available collagen membranes in a comparative manner. The natural origin of collagen makes standardization difficult. Nevertheless, through dimensional and mechanical measures it is possible to mechanically qualify collagen membranes, and compare them.METHODS:Three commercially available collagen membranes used in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) and in Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) techniques, namely Bio-Gide, Collprotect and Jason, were chosen for the comparison. Quasi-static (tensile tests) and time-dependent (stress relaxation test) mechanical tests together with a functional test (tear test) were done to determine the responses of collagen membranes under different loading conditions. RESULTS: The tested membranes exhibited different behaviours, different deformability values and thickness, Jason being the thinnest and Bio-Gide the thickest. Similar differences were also observed in terms of surface density. DISCUSSION: Even though clinical observations were not within the aim of this study, our findings indicate that a better understanding of the correlation between mechanical properties and thickness could lead to a more rational design and use of these membranes in the face of specific clinical cases.

Mechanical qualification of collagen membranes used in dentistry / Ortolani, Emanuela; Quadrini, Fabrizio; Bellisario, Denise; Santo, Loredana; Polimeni, Antonella; Santarsiero, Anna. - In: ANNALI DELL'ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITÀ. - ISSN 0021-2571. - STAMPA. - 51:3(2015), pp. 229-235. [10.4415/ANN_15_03_11]

Mechanical qualification of collagen membranes used in dentistry

POLIMENI, Antonella
Penultimo
;
2015

Abstract

The aim of this work is the qualification of commercially available collagen membranes in a comparative manner. The natural origin of collagen makes standardization difficult. Nevertheless, through dimensional and mechanical measures it is possible to mechanically qualify collagen membranes, and compare them.METHODS:Three commercially available collagen membranes used in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) and in Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) techniques, namely Bio-Gide, Collprotect and Jason, were chosen for the comparison. Quasi-static (tensile tests) and time-dependent (stress relaxation test) mechanical tests together with a functional test (tear test) were done to determine the responses of collagen membranes under different loading conditions. RESULTS: The tested membranes exhibited different behaviours, different deformability values and thickness, Jason being the thinnest and Bio-Gide the thickest. Similar differences were also observed in terms of surface density. DISCUSSION: Even though clinical observations were not within the aim of this study, our findings indicate that a better understanding of the correlation between mechanical properties and thickness could lead to a more rational design and use of these membranes in the face of specific clinical cases.
2015
collagen; membrane mechanical testing; guided tissue regeneration; guided bone regeneration
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Mechanical qualification of collagen membranes used in dentistry / Ortolani, Emanuela; Quadrini, Fabrizio; Bellisario, Denise; Santo, Loredana; Polimeni, Antonella; Santarsiero, Anna. - In: ANNALI DELL'ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITÀ. - ISSN 0021-2571. - STAMPA. - 51:3(2015), pp. 229-235. [10.4415/ANN_15_03_11]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Ortolani_Mechanical_2015.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: http://old.iss.it/binary/publ/cont/ANN_15_03_11.pdf
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 217.94 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
217.94 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/832323
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 22
  • Scopus 56
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 52
social impact